Performance · Readiness · Wellbeing
Private insight for people.
Earlier understanding for organisations.
My LIMEN is being built to give people meaningful benchmarks for their own progress, and organisations a protected view of how their people are doing.
Individual prototype available · Wider platform in development
For the person“How am I doing, for someone like me?”
For the organisation“What is changing across our people?”
The gap we are building for
An organisation can know everything about an incident, a deployment or a demanding period of work, and still know very little about its human impact.
My LIMEN’s vision connects two needs: useful context for the individual, and a current, protected understanding of the group.
Timings, actions and outcomes capture what happened.
People carry the demand, the recovery and the effect on their lives.
A personal benchmark or a protected group trend can offer another perspective.
The individual experience
Compare a result with a relevant cohort and follow your own direction. Fitness is the first use case; the wider vision includes readiness and wellbeing.
The planned organisational layer
Choose the questions, metrics and cohorts that matter in your setting. Build a view that updates as responses arrive, within privacy and data-quality rules.
Something you can explore today
The hosted prototype demonstrates the individual experience: entering a result, exploring a benchmark and seeing the comparison cohort.
Available to explore · Demonstration data
Try the individual prototype
Prefer your phone?
Scan the deck’s QR code
with your camera.my-limen.web.app
The prototype uses demonstration screens and sample data. The consumer product and Professional platform are in development.
The average for a comparable cohort, where suitable evidence exists. A score provides context; it is not a pass mark or a health assessment. Labels depend on the metric and its evidence.
My LIMEN Professional · Planned
Readiness after a deployment. Belonging during a university term. Recovery across a training block. Each setting asks different questions.
The planned Professional product lets organisations configure their own view, while the privacy floor and measurement rules remain protected.
Bring trends, participation and permitted cohort comparisons into one view. A result is more useful when you can see how many people contributed.
Planned product design from the deck. “Atlas Group” and all displayed data are fictional.
Build metrics and questions, choose the input frequency, and set permitted cohorts. Configuration operates inside the platform’s safeguards.
A deadlift is entered directly. A work–life balance measure may combine several short items, scored together. Thresholds work alongside safeguards for filters, timings and exports.
A sufficiently large or sustained group-level change may warrant a closer look. The intended signal points to what changed, leaving interpretation and response with the organisation.
Signals do not identify individuals, diagnose a cause or predict a crisis. This screen illustrates the planned model with fictional data.
Continuously updated means the view refreshes when responses arrive. It does not mean people are measured continuously, or that every change can be explained.
The human impact
A demanding event can have a strong effect without that effect being entirely negative. The planned post-event check-in asks about strength and direction separately.
Brief, voluntary questions could help people reflect and give organisations a protected picture of the shared experience.
Optional participation. Every question can be skipped. Non-diagnostic by design.
Trust before growth
The intended model keeps individual responses out of the organisation’s view. Protection also governs which group results can be released, and how they can be combined.
These are principles guiding development. The architecture and its safeguards must be evaluated before deployment.
Aggregated patterns, with no individual answers or lists of who did or did not respond.
Minimum thresholds are one layer of protection. Group size alone cannot guarantee anonymity.
Filters, timings, exports and combinations of results need protection too.
Sometimes the responsible outcome is to show no result.
Fictional groups illustrating the intended privacy model.From the manifesto’s commitments, carried into the deck. My LIMEN will never become:
“Sometimes the most responsible thing a data platform can say is: we do not need to know that.”
The person behind the question
Founder · Quiet Forge Ltd
Former Irish Naval Service.
Full-time firefighter.
“How am I really doing,
for someone like me?”
My LIMEN began with Kevin’s search for meaningful comparison without public exposure. A gym whiteboard could show everyone’s lifts, times and scores. It could not show what those results had taken.
His frontline experience brought a second perspective: organisations can record demanding work in detail while understanding much less about its effect on the people involved.
Those two experiences shaped the idea: give people useful insight into their own progress, and help organisations understand changing group patterns while protecting individual responses.
“Appearance is not capability.
Visibility is not truth.”
Experience shaped the idea. Independent evaluation will test its usefulness.
Where we are going
An individual prototype has been built with Foresight Mobile, the technical delivery partner behind the prototype and App Gameplan.
The next step is a consumer product and structured evaluation. The organisational layer follows when a pilot is agreed.
Explore the personal benchmark experience through the hosted demonstration.
Build the consumer product and evaluate trust, engagement, benchmark understanding and repeat participation.
Test the complete organisational loop in one focused setting, before exploring a second environment.
The planned business model
Personal value and organisational understanding are part of the same vision.
The next chapter
We’re looking for thoughtful partners to help develop, evaluate and responsibly introduce My LIMEN.
For prospective investors, strategic partners and organisations interested in a focused pilot.
Opens an email to Kevin.
For university and research partners interested in independent evaluation, ethics oversight and publishable findings.
Opens an email to Kevin.
Evaluation should be able to challenge the idea and publish findings that do not flatter the product.
Request the presentation deckA little more context
Fitness is the first use case. The wider platform is being developed around private personal insight and protected organisational understanding across performance, readiness and wellbeing. Different measures need different questions, benchmarks and safeguards.
No. Privacy is a founding commitment. Whether the model supports trust, perceived candour and consistent engagement is a research question to test, alongside limitations such as self-reporting and participation bias.
In the planned model, it shows that something has changed across a group large enough to report on safely. It cannot identify a person, determine the cause, diagnose a condition or predict a crisis. The organisation remains responsible for interpreting and responding to the signal.
The individual prototype (opens in a new tab) is available with demonstration data. It is separate from the consumer product and the planned Professional platform. You can explore this landing page without an account.
Start a conversation
Tell Kevin about your setting,
your question, or the opportunity you see.
